Tagline Header

Neighborhood blog POV: Outside.in and Everyblock

By justinc Follow us on Twitter | Register for Beta

A neighborhood blogger's business is built on top of unique local content and attention. That's the basic equation. Place-based aggregators, then, are double-edged swords. They bring a 'hood blog distribution and attention but they can and do damage the perceived uniqueness of the content. There are few things more frustrating on this planet for a placeblogger than finding Outside.in's version of your post ranking higher in search results than the actual post. Just writing that out makes me get hot under the collar.

To date, Outside.in has been the only big player focusing on "place" in the aggregator space. But starting in August, Seattle also got its first exposure to EveryBlock. The services can be described similarly but have quite a different take on things. Outside.in is focused almost exclusively on created content whereas EveryBlock gives equal emphasis to semi-automated sources like the latest restaurant inspection reports or land use filings. Because of this, EveryBlock is much more useful to me as a quick and easy way to keep track of this kind of informaton. While I still check my feeds from Outside.in a few times a day looking for interesting bits to share on my Capitolhillseattle.com blog, EveryBlock is more often a source I use in my posts.

But news gathering is not my primary concern with these aggregators. I want eyeballs! After giving EveryBlock a few months to settle in here in the Pacific Northwest, I was curious to see how well these double-edged swords were working the attention side of the blade. Below, you'll see two fever lines representing weekly raw click-thrus from the two sites to our Neighborlogs beta sites in Seattle:

I was surprised to see both how much EveryBlock is scuffling along and that Outside.in is growing. Comparing the past four weeks vs. the four previous to that, OI has sent about 32% more clicks to the Seattle Neighborlogs sites while EveryBlock was up only 1%. Now, confounding factors definitely should be included in this. For one, we've added a few beta sites in the last four weeks so the 32% is boosted a bit by that (but not much because the new sites are so, well, new!) Also, EveryBlock is not in as many markets as OI (though it's fully deployed here). And it's possible that outside.in has made changes in its recipe that somehow emphasize sites like the ones people build using Neighborlogs. 

I also looked at the quality of visitors sent by the two systems to see whether I was getting flooded by low-engagement, drive-by visits from the sites.

EveryBlock's visitors stuck around longer and were a bit more engaged but a smaller percentage of them were new eyeballs.  Overall, however, quality from both sites was good. Now, if they can just come up with some solid ways to help 'hood bloggers further monetize those eyeballs.

Permalink
posted on Fri, Dec 12, 2008 01:20 PM
last updated on Fri, Dec 12, 2008 02:17 PM
Good writeup byAdrian Holovaty December 12, 2008 ( report abuse ) ( reply )
Really good stuff -- and thanks for saying you find EveryBlock more useful in your own tracking of neighborhood news. :-)

Thanks for sharing this,
Adrian @ EveryBlock
Ditto byMark Josephson December 12, 2008 ( report abuse ) ( reply )
Think Adrian and I agree there is a huge need for more neighborhood news and you guys are doing a great job helping to fill it.

thanks for sharing.

mark
more thanks... bySteven Johnson December 12, 2008 ( report abuse ) ( reply )
Really interesting, Justin. I suspect you'll see both Everyblock and outside.in growing substantially in your referral logs over the next few years. We're on a good growth stretch right now, but Everyblock has only been in Seattle for a few months, so I'm sure they're going to start climbing as well.

I haven't talked to Adrian about this, but as Mark suggested, I suspect Adrian shares the same assumption that we have that there's room for a number of different "meta" sites that organize, aggregate, map, and filter locally relevant information...

On the Google ranking thing, we do a lot of things to try to ensure the bloggers rank more highly than we do for individual stories (only run very short excerpts, organize all content by place/tag, not by post titles, etc). Most of the time, I believe we rank more highly only where we have a large assortment of stories about a given place or topic, but we all know how fickle PageRank can be.

But our general idea has been that by linking extensively to the local bloggers from all our pages, we're going to be a significant net positive for them, in rank and in referrals. (It's a link economy, right?) It sounds from your log analysis that you're starting to see that as well. That's good news for all of us.

thanks for this,

sbj
Getting Outside.In to pull from my site byColleen December 17, 2008 ( report abuse ) ( reply )
I <3 Outside.In, and would love to see my story there. Since my traffic's pretty low, I wonder if Outside.In just hasn't picked up on it yet? Any tips on how to get that connection set up?
RE: Getting Outside.In to pull from my site byMark Josephson December 22, 2008 ( report abuse )
Hi Colleen.

Go to http://www.outside.in/geotoolkit.

Submit your feed and you'll be in the system.

You can also get StoryMaps of your content that organize your headlines on a map and link directly to you.

you can also email contact outside.in.

thanks,

mark
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: